Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology

26.9k citations
1.4k papers · · active since 1950

Impact in

Papers in

Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology

1.2k papers receiving 24.0k citations

Peers

Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology
Comparison fields: 5 of 178
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 4.4k
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 11.0k
  • Clinical Psychology 8.2k
  • Reproductive Medicine 2.9k
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 4.7k
Replace Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics & Gynecology with:
Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics & Gynecology United States
Women s Health Issues United States
Archives of Women s Mental Health United States
Journal of Midwifery & Women s Health United States
Birth United States
JAMA Psychiatry United States
International Review of Psychiatry United States
Culture Health & Sexuality United States
British Journal of Health Psychology United Kingdom
Women and Birth Australia
Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology relative to Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics & Gynecology United States Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics & Gynecology's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics & Gynecology · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology.

About Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology

The 1.4k papers published in Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology in the last decades have received a total of 26.9k indexed citations . Papers published in Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology usually cover Obstetrics and Gynecology (261 papers), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (649 papers), Reproductive Medicine (188 papers), Clinical Psychology (447 papers) and Pharmacy (77 papers) specifically the topics of Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum (540 papers), Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions (238 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (192 papers), Reproductive Health and Technologies (174 papers), Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (146 papers), Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (145 papers), Infant Development and Preterm Care (125 papers) and Family Dynamics and Relationships (122 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology are John Cox, Declan Murray, John T. Condon, Carolyn J. Corkindale, Pauline Slade, Colin R. Martin, Susan Ayers, Helen Beckwith, Jonathan A. Smith and Julie Jomeen.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact