Social Marketing Quarterly

666 papers and 7.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 666 papers published in Social Marketing Quarterly in the last decades have received a total of 7.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Social Marketing Quarterly usually cover Marketing (217 papers), Sociology and Political Science (169 papers) and General Health Professions (116 papers) specifically the topics of Behavioral Health and Interventions (101 papers), Service and Product Innovation (96 papers) and Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification (93 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Social Marketing Quarterly are Alan R. Andreasen, R. Craig Lefebvre, V. Dao Truong, Robert Hornik, Michael Rothschild, Nancy Lee, Marshall W. Kreuter, Lawrence W. Green, Philip Kotler and Diogo Veríssimo.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Social Marketing Quarterly

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Social Marketing Quarterly. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Social Marketing Quarterly.

Countries where authors publish in Social Marketing Quarterly

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Social Marketing Quarterly. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Social Marketing Quarterly with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Social Marketing Quarterly more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025