This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Strabismus. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Strabismus with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Strabismus more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Strabismus. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Strabismus.
About Strabismus
The 901 papers published in Strabismus in the last decades have received a total of 9.1k indexed citations . Papers published in Strabismus usually cover Pathology and Forensic Medicine (403 papers), Ophthalmology (162 papers), Anatomy (19 papers), Neurology (65 papers) and Epidemiology (238 papers) specifically the topics of Ophthalmology and Eye Disorders (394 papers), Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (215 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (88 papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (79 papers), Vestibular and auditory disorders (56 papers), Pituitary Gland Disorders and Treatments (39 papers), Intraocular Surgery and Lenses (37 papers) and Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders (30 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Strabismus are Fiona J. Rowe, Huibert J. Simonsz, Dennis M. Levi, Lynne Kiorpes, Jonathan M. Holmes, Emma Dawson, H.J. Simonsz, Abbasali Yekta, Ruxandra Sireteanu and Brian G. Mohney.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.