Progress in molecular biology and translational science · 1×
×3.23k/1kOPHTH
×3.63k/898PFM
×1.72k/1kCN
×1.34k/3kEPIDE
×0.5734/2kNEURO
Citations per year
'16
'17
'18
'19
'20
'21
'22
'23
'24
'25
'26
Countries where authors publish in Strabismus
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Strabismus. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Strabismus with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Strabismus more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Strabismus. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Strabismus.
About Strabismus
The 859 papers published in Strabismus in the last decades have received a total of 8.5k indexed citations . Papers published in Strabismus usually cover Ophthalmology (303 papers), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (452 papers), Anatomy (20 papers), Neurology (85 papers) and Neurology (147 papers) specifically the topics of Ophthalmology and Eye Disorders (443 papers), Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (277 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (167 papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (119 papers), Pituitary Gland Disorders and Treatments (79 papers), Vestibular and auditory disorders (77 papers), Intraocular Surgery and Lenses (66 papers) and Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis (57 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Strabismus are Fiona J. Rowe, Huibert J. Simonsz, Dennis M. Levi, Lynne Kiorpes, Jonathan M. Holmes, H.J. Simonsz, Emma Dawson, Abbasali Yekta, Merrick J. Moseley and Brian G. Mohney.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.