Revista de Antropologia

862 papers and 4.5k indexed citations i.

About

The 862 papers published in Revista de Antropologia in the last decades have received a total of 4.5k indexed citations. Papers published in Revista de Antropologia usually cover Urban Studies (246 papers), Sociology and Political Science (226 papers) and General Health Professions (136 papers) specifically the topics of Urban and sociocultural dynamics (199 papers), Indigenous Health and Education (118 papers) and Indigenous Studies in Latin America (90 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Revista de Antropologia are Patrícia Izar, Aracy Lopes da Silva, Fraya Frehse, Lilia Katri Moritz Schwarcz, Florestán Fernandes, Egon Schaden, Rui Sérgio Sereni Murrieta, Antônio Sérgio Alfredo Guimarães, Roberto Cardoso de Oliveira and Márcio Goldman.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Revista de Antropologia

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Revista de Antropologia. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Revista de Antropologia.

Countries where authors publish in Revista de Antropologia

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Revista de Antropologia. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Revista de Antropologia with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Revista de Antropologia more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025