Journal of Roman Archaeology

10.3k citations
1.2k papers · · active since 1950

Impact in

  • Archeology top 1%
    • Ancient Mediterranean Archaeology and History
    • Archaeology and Historical Studies
    • Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies
    • Maritime and Coastal Archaeology
    • Classical Antiquity Studies

Papers in

    • Ancient Mediterranean Archaeology and History 632
    • Archaeology and Historical Studies 320
    • Ancient and Medieval Archaeology Studies 117
    • Archaeological and Historical Studies 103
    • Ancient Egypt and Archaeology 96
    • Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies 82

Journal of Roman Archaeology

767 papers receiving 6.6k citations

Peers

Journal of Roman Archaeology
Comparison fields: 5 of 158
  • Archeology 6.5k
  • Anthropology 5.6k
  • Classics 1.6k
  • Space and Planetary Science 447
  • Paleontology 999
Replace Hesperia The Journal of the American School of Classical Studies at Athens with:
Hesperia The Journal of the American School of Classical Studies at Athens United States
Britannia United Kingdom
Bulletin de correspondance hellénique France
Journal of the Economic and Social History of the Orient United States
The Annual of the British School at Athens United Kingdom
Comptes-rendus des séances de l année - Académie des inscriptions et belles-lettres France
Syria France
Mélanges de l École française de Rome Antiquité France
The Antiquaries Journal United Kingdom
The Journal of Hellenic Studies United Kingdom
Journal of Roman Archaeology relative to Hesperia The Journal of the American School of Classical Studies at Athens United States Hesperia The Journal of the American School of Classical Studies at Athens's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
Hesperia The Journal of the American School of Classical Studies at Athens · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Journal of Roman Archaeology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Roman Archaeology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Roman Archaeology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Roman Archaeology more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Journal of Roman Archaeology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Roman Archaeology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Roman Archaeology.

About Journal of Roman Archaeology

The 1.2k papers published in Journal of Roman Archaeology in the last decades have received a total of 10.3k indexed citations . Papers published in Journal of Roman Archaeology usually cover Archeology (857 papers), Space and Planetary Science (79 papers), Anthropology (440 papers), Classics (70 papers) and History (170 papers) specifically the topics of Ancient Mediterranean Archaeology and History (632 papers), Classical Antiquity Studies (402 papers), Archaeology and Historical Studies (320 papers), Historical and Religious Studies of Rome (120 papers), Ancient and Medieval Archaeology Studies (117 papers), Archaeological and Historical Studies (103 papers), Ancient Egypt and Archaeology (96 papers) and Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies (82 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Roman Archaeology are David Mattingly, Walter Scheidel, Anthony King, Richard Duncan-Jones, Greg Woolf, Christer Bruun, Christopher Howgego, John Pearce, Kevin Greene and Roger S. Bagnall.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact