Asian journal of social science

984 papers and 5.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 984 papers published in Asian journal of social science in the last decades have received a total of 5.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Asian journal of social science usually cover Sociology and Political Science (648 papers), Political Science and International Relations (276 papers) and Anthropology (93 papers) specifically the topics of Asian Studies and History (239 papers), Socioeconomic Development in Asia (163 papers) and Southeast Asian Sociopolitical Studies (92 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Asian journal of social science are Sharifah Munirah Alatas, Emma Porio, Kumi Yasunobu, Humnath Bhandari, John Clammer, Graeme Hugo, Hugh D. R. Baker, Annuska Derks, Daniel P. S. Goh and Young Jun Choi.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Asian journal of social science

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Asian journal of social science. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Asian journal of social science.

Countries where authors publish in Asian journal of social science

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Asian journal of social science. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Asian journal of social science with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Asian journal of social science more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025