Papers Revista de Sociologia

1.0k papers and 4.1k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.0k papers published in Papers Revista de Sociologia in the last decades have received a total of 4.1k indexed citations. Papers published in Papers Revista de Sociologia usually cover Sociology and Political Science (402 papers), General Social Sciences (203 papers) and Political Science and International Relations (175 papers) specifically the topics of Social Sciences and Policies (201 papers), Employment, Labor, and Gender Studies (110 papers) and Immigration and Intercultural Education (96 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Papers Revista de Sociologia are Henri Lefebvre, Vidal Díaz de Rada Igúzquiza, John R. Searle, Sònia Parella Rubio, Lluís Flaquer, José Antonio Noguera, Paul Trowler, Enrique Martín Criado, Elisabetta Zontini and Russell King.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Papers Revista de Sociologia

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Papers Revista de Sociologia. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Papers Revista de Sociologia.

Countries where authors publish in Papers Revista de Sociologia

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Papers Revista de Sociologia. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Papers Revista de Sociologia with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Papers Revista de Sociologia more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025