Practical Metallography

1.3k papers and 5.0k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.3k papers published in Practical Metallography in the last decades have received a total of 5.0k indexed citations. Papers published in Practical Metallography usually cover Mechanical Engineering (779 papers), Materials Chemistry (506 papers) and Mechanics of Materials (322 papers) specifically the topics of Aluminum Alloy Microstructure Properties (185 papers), Metal Alloys Wear and Properties (170 papers) and Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Steels (159 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Practical Metallography are D. Hüll, Frank Mücklich, Joachim Ohser, Helmut Clemens, Joachim Mayer, Ute Salzberger, George F. Vander Voort, Gunther Eggeler, Svea Mayer and M. Balden.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Practical Metallography

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Practical Metallography. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Practical Metallography.

Countries where authors publish in Practical Metallography

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Practical Metallography. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Practical Metallography with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Practical Metallography more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025