Remote Sensing Reviews

255 papers and 10.1k indexed citations i.

About

The 255 papers published in Remote Sensing Reviews in the last decades have received a total of 10.1k indexed citations. Papers published in Remote Sensing Reviews usually cover Global and Planetary Change (116 papers), Environmental Engineering (111 papers) and Ecology (102 papers) specifically the topics of Remote Sensing in Agriculture (98 papers), Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications (50 papers) and Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics (35 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Remote Sensing Reviews are Narendra S. Goel, Toby N. Carlson, Paul M. Rich, Christian Mätzler, F. Bonn, Denis Morin, Alfredo Huete, A. Bannari, Pol Coppin and Marvin E. Bauer.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Remote Sensing Reviews

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Remote Sensing Reviews. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Remote Sensing Reviews.

Countries where authors publish in Remote Sensing Reviews

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Remote Sensing Reviews. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Remote Sensing Reviews with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Remote Sensing Reviews more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025