Separation and Purification Reviews

311 papers and 12.7k indexed citations i.

About

The 311 papers published in Separation and Purification Reviews in the last decades have received a total of 12.7k indexed citations. Papers published in Separation and Purification Reviews usually cover Biomedical Engineering (115 papers), Water Science and Technology (101 papers) and Mechanical Engineering (93 papers) specifically the topics of Membrane Separation Technologies (69 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (42 papers) and Extraction and Separation Processes (42 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Separation and Purification Reviews are Imran Ali, Enrico Drioli, Efrem Curcio, Parimal Pal, Tejraj M. Aminabhavi, S. Sridhar, Chengyue Li, Biaohua Chen, Zhigang Lei and Ahmad Fauzi Ismail.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Separation and Purification Reviews

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Separation and Purification Reviews. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Separation and Purification Reviews.

Countries where authors publish in Separation and Purification Reviews

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Separation and Purification Reviews. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Separation and Purification Reviews with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Separation and Purification Reviews more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025