Behavioral and Brain Functions

725 papers and 25.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 725 papers published in Behavioral and Brain Functions in the last decades have received a total of 25.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Behavioral and Brain Functions usually cover Cognitive Neuroscience (359 papers), Psychiatry and Mental health (178 papers) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (148 papers) specifically the topics of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (122 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (120 papers) and Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (84 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Behavioral and Brain Functions are Wolfram Schultz, Terje Sagvolden, Rosemary Tannock, Dénes Szűcs, Bruce D. McCandliss, Amy F.T. Arnsten, Irene Winkler, Stefan Haufe, Michael Tangermann and Wim E. Crusio.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Behavioral and Brain Functions

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Behavioral and Brain Functions. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Behavioral and Brain Functions.

Countries where authors publish in Behavioral and Brain Functions

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Behavioral and Brain Functions. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Behavioral and Brain Functions with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Behavioral and Brain Functions more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025