Countries where authors publish in Qualitative Sociology
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Qualitative Sociology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Qualitative Sociology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Qualitative Sociology more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Qualitative Sociology
This network shows the impact of papers published in Qualitative Sociology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Qualitative Sociology.
About Qualitative Sociology
The 1.1k papers published in Qualitative Sociology in the last decades have received a total of 36.8k indexed citations . Papers published in Qualitative Sociology usually cover Sociology and Political Science (688 papers), Gender Studies (143 papers), Public Administration (47 papers), Urban Studies (44 papers) and Music (22 papers) specifically the topics of Social and Cultural Dynamics (97 papers), Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics (84 papers), Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice (53 papers), Management and Organizational Studies (47 papers), Migration, Ethnicity, and Economy (42 papers), Homelessness and Social Issues (38 papers), Crime Patterns and Interventions (37 papers) and Gender, Feminism, and Media (35 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Qualitative Sociology are Anselm Strauss, Juliet M. Corbin, David L. Altheide, Loic J. D. Wacquant, Kevin D. Haggerty, Ugo Corte, Patrik Aspers, Eviatar Zerubavel, Thomas Muhr and Elisabeth Jean Wood.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.