Pythagoras

250 papers and 1.5k indexed citations i.

About

The 250 papers published in Pythagoras in the last decades have received a total of 1.5k indexed citations. Papers published in Pythagoras usually cover Education (214 papers), Statistics and Probability (103 papers) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (46 papers) specifically the topics of Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques (161 papers), Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills (76 papers) and Statistics Education and Methodologies (44 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Pythagoras are Michael De Villiers, Kakoma Luneta, Aneshkumar Maharaj, Sarah Bansilal, Jill Adler, Hamsa Venkat, Karin Brodie, Caroline Long, Paul Webb and Mellony Graven.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Pythagoras

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Pythagoras. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Pythagoras.

Countries where authors publish in Pythagoras

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Pythagoras. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Pythagoras with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Pythagoras more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025