Proteome Science

17.0k citations
707 papers · · active since 1950

Impact in

  • Spectroscopy top 10%
    • Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
    • Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications
    • Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies
    • Photosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms
    • Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
    • Machine Learning in Bioinformatics

Papers in

    • Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications 89
    • Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications 21
    • Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks 21
    • Advanced Biosensing Techniques and Applications 13
    • Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies 10
    • Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research 9
    • Machine Learning in Bioinformatics 9
    • Protein Structure and Dynamics 9

Proteome Science

425 papers receiving 10.7k citations

Peers

Proteome Science
Comparison fields: 5 of 189
  • Spectroscopy 2.4k
  • Molecular Biology 8.0k
  • Plant Science 2.5k
  • Microbiology 369
  • Cell Biology 906
Replace Current Protocols in Protein Science with:
Current Protocols in Protein Science United States
Drug Discovery Today Technologies United States
BMC Structural Biology United States
Advances in enzymology and related areas of molecular biology/Advances in enzymology and related subjects United States
Biotechnology and Genetic Engineering Reviews China
Biophysical Reviews United States
Current Protocols in Molecular Biology United States
Critical Reviews in Clinical Laboratory Sciences United States
Assay and Drug Development Technologies United States
Acta Crystallographica Section D Structural Biology United States
Proteome Science relative to Current Protocols in Protein Science United States Current Protocols in Protein Science's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.3×
Current Protocols in Protein Science · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Proteome Science

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Proteome Science. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Proteome Science with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Proteome Science more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Proteome Science

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Proteome Science. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Proteome Science.

About Proteome Science

The 707 papers published in Proteome Science in the last decades have received a total of 17.0k indexed citations . Papers published in Proteome Science usually cover Spectroscopy (91 papers), Molecular Biology (152 papers), Microbiology (9 papers), Hepatology (9 papers) and Immunology (23 papers) specifically the topics of Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications (89 papers), Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks (21 papers), Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications (21 papers), Advanced Biosensing Techniques and Applications (13 papers), Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies (10 papers), Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research (9 papers), Machine Learning in Bioinformatics (9 papers) and Protein Structure and Dynamics (9 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Proteome Science are Karlheinz Mann, Matthias Mann, François Chevalier, Albert J. Poustka, Lambert Ngoka, Susan B. Altenbach, William H. Vensel, Charlene K. Tanaka, William J. Hurkman and Éric Chevet.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact