Trends in Biochemical Sciences

6.4k papers and 585.8k indexed citations i.

About

The 6.4k papers published in Trends in Biochemical Sciences in the last decades have received a total of 585.8k indexed citations. Papers published in Trends in Biochemical Sciences usually cover Molecular Biology (4.3k papers), Cell Biology (839 papers) and Genetics (505 papers) specifically the topics of RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms (865 papers), RNA Research and Splicing (478 papers) and RNA modifications and cancer (444 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Trends in Biochemical Sciences are Péter Tompa, R. John Ellis, Andrei N. Lupas, Thomas E. Creighton, Thomas von Zglinicki, Johannes Büchner, L. Aravind, Christopher M. Dobson, Jason W. Locasale and C. H. GRAY.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Trends in Biochemical Sciences

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Trends in Biochemical Sciences. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Trends in Biochemical Sciences.

Countries where authors publish in Trends in Biochemical Sciences

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Trends in Biochemical Sciences. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Trends in Biochemical Sciences with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Trends in Biochemical Sciences more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025