Trends in Biochemical Sciences

6.5k papers and 592.2k indexed citations

About

The 6.5k papers published in Trends in Biochemical Sciences in the last decades have received a total of 592.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Trends in Biochemical Sciences usually cover Molecular Biology (4.4k papers), Cell Biology (843 papers) and Genetics (509 papers) specifically the topics of RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms (869 papers), RNA Research and Splicing (482 papers) and RNA modifications and cancer (451 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Trends in Biochemical Sciences are Péter Tompa, R. John Ellis, Roger A. Sayle, Andrei N. Lupas, Thomas von Zglinicki, Johannes Büchner, Jason W. Locasale, L. Aravind, Christopher M. Dobson and Maria V. Liberti.

In The Last Decade

Trends in Biochemical Sciences

5.7k papers receiving 557.8k citations

Fields of papers published in Trends in Biochemical Sciences

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Trends in Biochemical Sciences. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Trends in Biochemical Sciences.

Countries where authors publish in Trends in Biochemical Sciences

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Trends in Biochemical Sciences. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Trends in Biochemical Sciences with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Trends in Biochemical Sciences more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026