Progress in Surface Science

847 papers and 49.0k indexed citations i.

About

The 847 papers published in Progress in Surface Science in the last decades have received a total of 49.0k indexed citations. Papers published in Progress in Surface Science usually cover Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (472 papers), Materials Chemistry (280 papers) and Electrical and Electronic Engineering (254 papers) specifically the topics of Surface and Thin Film Phenomena (195 papers), Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (168 papers) and Electron and X-Ray Spectroscopy Techniques (110 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Progress in Surface Science are Frank Schreiber, Matthias Batzill, Ulrike Diebold, B.V. Derjaguin, Christof Wöll, R. C. Cammarata, Peter J. Feibelman, B. E. Conway, L.D. LANDAU and C. S. Fadley.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Progress in Surface Science

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Progress in Surface Science. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Progress in Surface Science.

Countries where authors publish in Progress in Surface Science

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Progress in Surface Science. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Progress in Surface Science with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Progress in Surface Science more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025