Progress in Materials Science

1.2k papers and 263.0k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.2k papers published in Progress in Materials Science in the last decades have received a total of 263.0k indexed citations. Papers published in Progress in Materials Science usually cover Materials Chemistry (618 papers), Mechanical Engineering (386 papers) and Biomedical Engineering (251 papers) specifically the topics of Microstructure and mechanical properties (96 papers), Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties (65 papers) and Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials (54 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Progress in Materials Science are C. Suryanarayana, Р. З. Валиев, Terence G. Langdon, H. Gleiter, John Banhart, Marc A. Meyers, Robert C. Pullar, Igor V. Alexandrov, Rinat K. Islamgaliev and Xiaobing Ren.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Progress in Materials Science

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Progress in Materials Science. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Progress in Materials Science.

Countries where authors publish in Progress in Materials Science

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Progress in Materials Science. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Progress in Materials Science with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Progress in Materials Science more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025