Current Opinion in Solid State and Materials Science

76.2k citations
1.2k papers · · active since 1950

Impact in

Papers in

    • Microstructure and mechanical properties 64
    • Catalytic Processes in Materials Science 56
    • Electronic and Structural Properties of Oxides 43
    • Diamond and Carbon-based Materials Research 40

Current Opinion in Solid State and Materials Science

1.1k papers receiving 73.9k citations

Peers

Current Opinion in Solid State and Materials Science
Comparison fields: 5 of 215
  • Materials Chemistry 40.0k
  • Metals and Alloys 2.2k
  • Ceramics and Composites 3.7k
  • Biomaterials 7.5k
  • Mechanical Engineering 19.3k
Replace International Materials Reviews with:
International Materials Reviews United States
npj Computational Materials United States
Journal of Physical and Chemical Reference Data United States
Nanostructured Materials United States
Progress in Materials Science China
Nature Reviews Materials United States
Journal of Magnesium and Alloys China
Progress in Energy and Combustion Science United States
Powder Diffraction United States
Annual Review of Physical Chemistry United States
Current Opinion in Solid State and Materials Science relative to International Materials Reviews United States International Materials Reviews's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
International Materials Reviews · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Current Opinion in Solid State and Materials Science

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Current Opinion in Solid State and Materials Science. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Current Opinion in Solid State and Materials Science with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Current Opinion in Solid State and Materials Science more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Current Opinion in Solid State and Materials Science

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Current Opinion in Solid State and Materials Science. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Current Opinion in Solid State and Materials Science.

About Current Opinion in Solid State and Materials Science

The 1.2k papers published in Current Opinion in Solid State and Materials Science in the last decades have received a total of 76.2k indexed citations . Papers published in Current Opinion in Solid State and Materials Science usually cover Structural Biology (30 papers), Materials Chemistry (608 papers), Ceramics and Composites (72 papers), Surfaces, Coatings and Films (55 papers) and Metals and Alloys (18 papers) specifically the topics of Microstructure and mechanical properties (64 papers), Catalytic Processes in Materials Science (56 papers), Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications (52 papers), Electronic and Structural Properties of Oxides (43 papers), Advanced ceramic materials synthesis (42 papers), Metal and Thin Film Mechanics (40 papers), Diamond and Carbon-based Materials Research (40 papers) and nanoparticles nucleation surface interactions (39 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Current Opinion in Solid State and Materials Science are Bruno C. De Cooman, S.T. Aruna, B. Ellis, Linda F. Nazar, Katsuaki Suganuma, Carlos G. Levi, Abraham Clearfield, Anthony M. Lowman, K.R. Patil and Dragan Damjanović.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact