Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Computational Molecular Science

80.9k citations
663 papers · · active since 1950

Impact in

Papers in

Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Computational Molecular Science

642 papers receiving 80.2k citations

Peers

Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Computational Molecular Science
Comparison fields: 5 of 210
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 11.6k
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 22.4k
  • Inorganic Chemistry 9.7k
  • Organic Chemistry 17.2k
  • Spectroscopy 9.9k
Replace Journal of Physical and Chemical Reference Data with:
Journal of Physical and Chemical Reference Data United States
Nature Reviews Materials United States
Nature Reviews Chemistry United States
International Reviews in Physical Chemistry United States
Progress in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy United States
Topics in current chemistry United States
Advances In Physics United Kingdom
Acta Crystallographica Section B Structural Science Crystal Engineering and Materials Russia
Quarterly Reviews of Biophysics United States
Progress in Energy and Combustion Science United States
Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Computational Molecular Science relative to Journal of Physical and Chemical Reference Data United States Journal of Physical and Chemical Reference Data's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Journal of Physical and Chemical Reference Data · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Computational Molecular Science

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Computational Molecular Science. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Computational Molecular Science with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Computational Molecular Science more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Computational Molecular Science

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Computational Molecular Science. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Computational Molecular Science.

About Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Computational Molecular Science

The 663 papers published in Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Computational Molecular Science in the last decades have received a total of 80.9k indexed citations . Papers published in Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Computational Molecular Science usually cover Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (110 papers), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (259 papers), Computational Theory and Mathematics (126 papers), Catalysis (42 papers) and Materials Chemistry (223 papers) specifically the topics of Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (181 papers), Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies (161 papers), Protein Structure and Dynamics (129 papers), Computational Drug Discovery Methods (125 papers), Machine Learning in Materials Science (106 papers), Photochemistry and Electron Transfer Studies (58 papers), Molecular Junctions and Nanostructures (36 papers) and Enzyme Structure and Function (36 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Computational Molecular Science are Frank Neese, Stefan Grimme, Johannes Kästner, Andreas Klamt, Jane S. Murray, Peter Politzer, Benedetta Mennucci, Christel M. Marian, Jürg Hutter and Hans‐Joachim Werner.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact