Annual Review of Public Health

170.5k citations
1.3k papers · · active since 2016

Impact in

  • Health top 1%
    • Health disparities and outcomes
    • Health Policy Implementation Science
    • Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations
    • Employment and Welfare Studies
    • Community Health and Development

Papers in

  • Health 168
    • Health disparities and outcomes 125
    • Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations 130
    • Public Health Policies and Education 122
    • Primary Care and Health Outcomes 88
    • Health Policy Implementation Science 77

Annual Review of Public Health

1.1k papers receiving 153.8k citations

Peers

Annual Review of Public Health
Comparison fields: 5 of 242
  • Health 15.8k
  • General Health Professions 39.0k
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 16.7k
  • Applied Psychology 4.5k
  • Clinical Psychology 14.8k
Replace Health Education & Behavior with:
Health Education & Behavior United States
Journal of Health and Social Behavior United States
Psychological Methods United States
Journal of Urban Health United States
Annual Review of Sociology United States
Structural Equation Modeling A Multidisciplinary Journal United States
Milbank Quarterly United States
Journal of Aging and Health United States
The Lancet Public Health United Kingdom
Perspectives on Psychological Science United States
Annual Review of Public Health relative to Health Education & Behavior United States Health Education & Behavior's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×8.8×
Health Education & Behavior · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Annual Review of Public Health

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Annual Review of Public Health. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Annual Review of Public Health with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Annual Review of Public Health more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Annual Review of Public Health

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Annual Review of Public Health. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Annual Review of Public Health.

About Annual Review of Public Health

The 1.3k papers published in Annual Review of Public Health in the last decades have received a total of 170.5k indexed citations . Papers published in Annual Review of Public Health usually cover Health (168 papers), General Health Professions (501 papers), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (106 papers), Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (136 papers) and Economics and Econometrics (188 papers) specifically the topics of Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations (130 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (125 papers), Healthcare Policy and Management (124 papers), Public Health Policies and Education (122 papers), Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology (101 papers), Primary Care and Health Outcomes (88 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (87 papers) and Health Policy Implementation Science (77 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Annual Review of Public Health are Paula Braveman, Tyler VanderWeele, Ronald C. Kessler, Karen Glanz, David R. Williams, Nancy R Krieger, Edith A. Parker, Barbara A. Israel, A Becker and Amy Jo Schulz.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact