NASSP Bulletin

38.3k citations
4.7k papers · · active since 2016

Impact in

  • Education top 1%
    • Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
    • Collaborative Teaching and Inclusion
    • Parental Involvement in Education
    • School Choice and Performance
    • Early Childhood Education and Development
    • Education Systems and Policy
    • Education and Critical Thinking Development

Papers in

    • Teacher Education and Leadership Studies 442
    • Collaborative Teaching and Inclusion 237
    • Education Systems and Policy 173
    • Parental Involvement in Education 146
    • Education and Technology Integration 141
    • School Choice and Performance 125
    • Educational Assessment and Improvement 133

NASSP Bulletin

1.7k papers receiving 15.6k citations

Peers

NASSP Bulletin
Comparison fields: 5 of 224
  • Education 25.2k
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 4.6k
  • Information Systems and Management 2.6k
  • Safety Research 2.4k
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 2.3k
Replace Education Sciences with:
Education Sciences United States
The Qualitative Report United States
Educational Review United Kingdom
Evaluation and Program Planning United States
Journal of Policy Analysis and Management United States
Qualitative Inquiry United States
Teaching Sociology United States
SAGE Open China
Higher Education Research & Development Australia
International Journal of Educational Development United Kingdom
NASSP Bulletin relative to Education Sciences United States Education Sciences's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×8×9.3×
Education Sciences · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in NASSP Bulletin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in NASSP Bulletin. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in NASSP Bulletin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites NASSP Bulletin more than expected).

Fields of papers published in NASSP Bulletin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in NASSP Bulletin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in NASSP Bulletin.

About NASSP Bulletin

The 4.7k papers published in NASSP Bulletin in the last decades have received a total of 38.3k indexed citations . Papers published in NASSP Bulletin usually cover Education (1.5k papers), Information Systems and Management (143 papers), Developmental and Educational Psychology (214 papers), Safety Research (134 papers) and General Agricultural and Biological Sciences (133 papers) specifically the topics of Teacher Education and Leadership Studies (442 papers), Collaborative Teaching and Inclusion (237 papers), Education Systems and Policy (173 papers), Parental Involvement in Education (146 papers), Education and Technology Integration (141 papers), Educational Assessment and Improvement (133 papers), Diverse Educational Innovations Studies (133 papers) and School Choice and Performance (125 papers). The most active scholars publishing in NASSP Bulletin are Douglas J. Fiore, Allan A. Glatthorn, Richard Paul, Helen M. Sharp, Linda M. McNeil, Richard M. Ingersoll, Mel Heller, Anne Wescott Dodd, James Gordon Ward and Thad Hall.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact