Evaluation and Program Planning

2.8k papers and 78.7k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.8k papers published in Evaluation and Program Planning in the last decades have received a total of 78.7k indexed citations. Papers published in Evaluation and Program Planning usually cover General Health Professions (1.1k papers), Management Science and Operations Research (879 papers) and Sociology and Political Science (343 papers) specifically the topics of Evaluation and Performance Assessment (800 papers), Health Policy Implementation Science (454 papers) and Community Health and Development (412 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Evaluation and Program Planning are David J. Flinders, Patrick E. Shrout, Ella Louise Bell, William M. K. Trochim, C. Clifford Attkisson, Leon Mann, Irving L. Janis, Anthony F. Lehman, Gregory C. Pascoe and Barry McGaw.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Evaluation and Program Planning

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Evaluation and Program Planning. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Evaluation and Program Planning.

Countries where authors publish in Evaluation and Program Planning

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Evaluation and Program Planning. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Evaluation and Program Planning with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Evaluation and Program Planning more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025