Molecular Neurodegeneration

93.1k citations
1.4k papers · · active since 2006

Impact in

  • Neurology top 2%
    • Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
    • Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
    • Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research
  • Physiology top 2%
    • Alzheimer's disease research and treatments

Papers in

    • Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments 224
    • Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms 155
    • Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research 139
    • Alzheimer's disease research and treatments 642
    • Lysosomal Storage Disorders Research 22

Molecular Neurodegeneration

1.3k papers receiving 91.6k citations

Peers

Molecular Neurodegeneration
Comparison fields: 5 of 178
  • Neurology 13k
  • Physiology 33.7k
  • Neurology 17.6k
  • Developmental Neuroscience 1.7k
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 7.2k
Replace Acta Neuropathologica Communications with:
Acta Neuropathologica Communications United States
Neurotherapeutics United States
EMBO Molecular Medicine United States
CNS & Neurological Disorders - Drug Targets United States
Current Alzheimer Research United States
Current Neuropharmacology United States
The Annual Review of Pharmacology and Toxicology United States
Neurotoxicity Research United States
Pharmacological Reviews United States
The Neuroscientist United States
Molecular Neurodegeneration relative to Acta Neuropathologica Communications United States Acta Neuropathologica Communications's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
Acta Neuropathologica Communications · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Molecular Neurodegeneration

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Molecular Neurodegeneration. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Molecular Neurodegeneration with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Molecular Neurodegeneration more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Molecular Neurodegeneration

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Molecular Neurodegeneration. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Molecular Neurodegeneration.

About Molecular Neurodegeneration

The 1.4k papers published in Molecular Neurodegeneration in the last decades have received a total of 93.1k indexed citations . Papers published in Molecular Neurodegeneration usually cover Neurology (380 papers), Physiology (664 papers), Neurology (187 papers), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (95 papers) and Developmental Neuroscience (18 papers) specifically the topics of Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (642 papers), Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments (224 papers), Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms (155 papers), Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research (139 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (76 papers), Genetic Neurodegenerative Diseases (44 papers), Autophagy in Disease and Therapy (24 papers) and Lysosomal Storage Disorders Research (22 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Molecular Neurodegeneration are Dennis W. Dickson, Michael A. Deture, Robert J. Vassar, Hui Zheng, Guojun Bu, David M. Holtzman, Mark Cookson, Huaxi Xu, Yangling Mu and Fred H. Gage.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact