Neurotherapeutics

1.8k papers and 73.3k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.8k papers published in Neurotherapeutics in the last decades have received a total of 73.3k indexed citations. Papers published in Neurotherapeutics usually cover Neurology (546 papers), Molecular Biology (527 papers) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (466 papers) specifically the topics of Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms (158 papers), Neurological disorders and treatments (150 papers) and Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments (142 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Neurotherapeutics are Erik G. Willcutt, Andrew L. Alexander, Jee Eun Lee, Aaron S. Field, Mariana Lazar, David J. Loane, Michelle L. Block, Melinda E. Lull, Ashley I. Bush and Costantino Iadecola.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Neurotherapeutics

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Neurotherapeutics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Neurotherapeutics.

Countries where authors publish in Neurotherapeutics

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Neurotherapeutics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Neurotherapeutics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Neurotherapeutics more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025