Countries where authors publish in Brain Pathology
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Brain Pathology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Brain Pathology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Brain Pathology more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Brain Pathology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Brain Pathology.
About Brain Pathology
The 2.3k papers published in Brain Pathology in the last decades have received a total of 131.2k indexed citations . Papers published in Brain Pathology usually cover Genetics (456 papers), Neurology (237 papers), Neurology (385 papers), Developmental Neuroscience (51 papers) and Physiology (347 papers) specifically the topics of Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment (441 papers), Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (277 papers), Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies (162 papers), Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms (127 papers), Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments (104 papers), Pituitary Gland Disorders and Treatments (82 papers), Meningioma and schwannoma management (82 papers) and Prion Diseases and Protein Misfolding (77 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Brain Pathology are Pieter Wesseling, Gosse J. Adema, Seth Love, Wolfgang Brück, Hans Lassmann, Bernd Walter Scheithauer, Ronald L. Hamilton, Isidró Ferrer, Claudia Francesca Lucchinetti and Paul Kleihues.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.