Countries where authors publish in Brain Pathology
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Brain Pathology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Brain Pathology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Brain Pathology more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Brain Pathology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Brain Pathology.
About Brain Pathology
The 2.1k papers published in Brain Pathology in the last decades have received a total of 113.1k indexed citations . Papers published in Brain Pathology usually cover Neurology (396 papers), Neurology (589 papers), Genetics (385 papers), Developmental Neuroscience (126 papers) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (365 papers) specifically the topics of Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment (335 papers), Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (306 papers), Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms (224 papers), Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments (146 papers), Neurological diseases and metabolism (125 papers), Prion Diseases and Protein Misfolding (119 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (114 papers) and Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms (110 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Brain Pathology are Seth Love, Wolfgang Brück, Hans Lassmann, Ronald L. Hamilton, Isidró Ferrer, Claudia F. Lucchinetti, Paul Kleihues, Ramesh Raghupathi, Herbert Budka and Jacqueline N. Crawley.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.