Countries where authors publish in Modern Intellectual History
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Modern Intellectual History. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Modern Intellectual History with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Modern Intellectual History more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Modern Intellectual History
This network shows the impact of papers published in Modern Intellectual History. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Modern Intellectual History.
About Modern Intellectual History
The 626 papers published in Modern Intellectual History in the last decades have received a total of 2.9k indexed citations . Papers published in Modern Intellectual History usually cover History (210 papers), History and Philosophy of Science (79 papers), Political Science and International Relations (290 papers), Philosophy (137 papers) and General Psychology (11 papers) specifically the topics of American Constitutional Law and Politics (113 papers), Political Theory and Influence (81 papers), European Political History Analysis (64 papers), Religion and Society Interactions (42 papers), French Historical and Cultural Studies (38 papers), Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought (38 papers), Philosophy, History, and Historiography (32 papers) and Race, History, and American Society (32 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Modern Intellectual History are Ian Hunter, Robert Darnton, C. A. Bayly, Michael C. Behrent, Joel Isaac, Shruti Kapila, John G. A. Pocock, Paul Warde, Peter Cain and James Chappel.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.