Peter Cain

4.4k citations
88 papers · 1.4k · h-index 20

Impact in

Papers in

Peter Cain

66 papers receiving 890 citations

Peers

Peter Cain
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
  • Anthropology 218
  • Economics and Econometrics 368
  • Political Science and International Relations 440
  • Sociology and Political Science 544
  • History 149
Replace Robert P. Brenner with:
Robert P. Brenner United States
A. G. Hopkins United Kingdom
David K. Fieldhouse United Kingdom
Harry W. Pearson
Edgar V. Kiser United States
Charles P. Issawi United States
John M. Hobson United Kingdom
Paul Kennedy United Kingdom
Marcel van der Linden Netherlands
Deirdre Coleman United Kingdom
Peter Cain relative to Robert P. Brenner United States Robert P. Brenner's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Robert P. Brenner · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Cain

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Cain's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Cain with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Cain more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Cain

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Cain. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Cain. The network helps show where Peter Cain may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 23 scholars most cited alongside Peter Cain, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Cain Line = papers co-authored together Peter Cain links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 88 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1987135
2 1996113
3 1980102
4 1986102
5 199494
6 198780
7 201466
8 200254
9 197947
10 199442
11 200738
12 198027
13 198427
14 199225
15 199424
16 199924
17 197823
18 199823
19
The Collected Works of Thorstein Veblen
199422
20 198421

About Peter Cain

Peter Cain is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations, Anthropology and Strategy and Management, having authored 88 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Colonial History and Postcolonial Studies (44 papers), Historical Economic and Social Studies (36 papers), Political Economy and Marxism (21 papers), Political and Economic history of UK and US (17 papers), African history and culture studies (16 papers), Political Theory and Influence (12 papers), Australian History and Society (9 papers) and Transport and Economic Policies (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Anthropology (218 citations), Economics and Econometrics (368 citations), Political Science and International Relations (440 citations), Sociology and Political Science (544 citations) and History (149 citations). Peter Cain has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include A. G. Hopkins, Lance E. Davis, Michael Havinden, David Meredith, Wolfgang J. Mommsen, Jürgen Osterhammel, Peter Harnetty, John C. Wood, Mark Harrison and Norman A. Etherington. Their work appears in journals such as The Economic History Review, The Journal of Imperial & Commonwealth History, Technology and Culture, History of Political Economy and The Economic Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact