Peter Cain

119 papers receiving 2.2k citations

Peers

Peter Cain
Comparison fields: 5 of 161
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 574
  • Anthropology 165
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 94
  • Sociology and Political Science 508
  • Political Science and International Relations 274
Replace Jon Stratton with:
Jon Stratton Australia
Jim McGuigan United Kingdom
Christopher J. Berry United Kingdom
Elizabeth Potter Australia
Barry W. Allen United States
David Robinson United Kingdom
Edward Vickers Japan
David Martin United States
John B.P. Stephenson United Kingdom
Anne G. Copay United States
Peter Cain relative to Jon Stratton Australia Jon Stratton's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.2×
Jon Stratton · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Cain

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Cain's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Cain with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Cain more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Cain

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Cain. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Cain. The network helps show where Peter Cain may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Cain, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Cain Line = papers co-authored together Peter Cain links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 128 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2009154
2 2014124
3 1996121
4 2017114
5 2013104
6 2004103
7 200196
8 199476
9 198670
10 198069
11 198762
12 201558
13 198658
14 197951
15 198747
16 200441
17 199641
18 200135
19 200135
20 201435

About Peter Cain

Peter Cain is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Sociology and Political Science, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Economics and Econometrics and Molecular Biology, having authored 128 papers that have together received 2.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors (20 papers), Australian History and Society (18 papers), Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics (17 papers), Historical Economic and Social Studies (12 papers), Transport and Economic Policies (5 papers), Signaling Pathways in Disease (5 papers), Economic Theory and Institutions (4 papers) and Economic Theory and Policy (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (574 citations), Anthropology (165 citations), Complementary and alternative medicine (94 citations), Sociology and Political Science (508 citations) and Political Science and International Relations (274 citations). Peter Cain has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include A. G. Hopkins, Thomas H. Marwick, Håkan Arheden, Colin Case, Lance E. Davis, Martin Ugander, Leanne Short, Erik Hedström, Peter Friberg and Marcus Carlsson. Their work appears in journals such as The Economic History Review, The American Journal of Cardiology, The Journal of Imperial & Commonwealth History, Clinical Physiology and Functional Imaging and British Journal of Anaesthesia.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact