This map shows the geographic impact of research published in differences. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in differences with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites differences more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in differences. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in differences.
About differences
The 619 papers published in differences in the last decades have received a total of 9.0k indexed citations . Papers published in differences usually cover Literature and Literary Theory (121 papers), Gender Studies (92 papers), Cultural Studies (80 papers), Music (29 papers) and Philosophy (91 papers) specifically the topics of Gender, Feminism, and Media (39 papers), Psychoanalysis, Philosophy, and Politics (37 papers), Hannah Arendt's Political Philosophy (34 papers), Cinema and Media Studies (33 papers), Race, History, and American Society (32 papers), Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism (32 papers), Foucault, Power, and Ethics (29 papers) and Feminism, Gender, and Sexuality Studies (28 papers). The most active scholars publishing in differences are Karen Barad, Judith Butler, Teresa de Lauretis, Mary Ann Doane, Susan Gál, Nancy K. Miller, Elizabeth Bernstein, Wendy Brown, Joan Wallach Scott and Lauren Berlant.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.