Intellectual History Review

1.2k citations
422 papers · · active since 2007

Impact in

    • Historical Philosophy and Science
    • History of Science and Natural History
    • History of Science and Medicine
    • Philosophy and History of Science
  • Philosophy top 10%
    • Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought
    • Kantian Philosophy and Modern Interpretations

Papers in

    • Historical Philosophy and Science 104
    • History of Science and Natural History 26
    • Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought 124
    • Rousseau and Enlightenment Thought 30
    • Philosophy and Historical Thought 19

Intellectual History Review

290 papers receiving 912 citations

Peers

Intellectual History Review
Comparison fields: 5 of 77
  • History and Philosophy of Science 370
  • Philosophy 433
  • History 256
  • Theoretical Computer Science 11
  • Classics 34
Replace Journal for Eighteenth-Century Studies with:
Journal for Eighteenth-Century Studies United Kingdom
Modern Intellectual History United States
Journal of the Philosophy of History United States
Studies in eighteenth century culture Spain
Bijdragen Netherlands
Journal of Victorian Culture United Kingdom
CR The New Centennial Review United States
History of Philosophy Quarterly United States
The Philosophical Forum United States
Early Science and Medicine United States
Intellectual History Review relative to Journal for Eighteenth-Century Studies United Kingdom Journal for Eighteenth-Century Studies's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×2.5×
Journal for Eighteenth-Century Studies · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Intellectual History Review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Intellectual History Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Intellectual History Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Intellectual History Review more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Intellectual History Review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Intellectual History Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Intellectual History Review.

About Intellectual History Review

The 422 papers published in Intellectual History Review in the last decades have received a total of 1.2k indexed citations . Papers published in Intellectual History Review usually cover History and Philosophy of Science (134 papers), Philosophy (200 papers), History (145 papers), Classics (17 papers) and Religious studies (23 papers) specifically the topics of Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought (124 papers), Historical Philosophy and Science (104 papers), Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (41 papers), Renaissance and Early Modern Studies (40 papers), Philosophy, History, and Historiography (31 papers), Rousseau and Enlightenment Thought (30 papers), History of Science and Natural History (26 papers) and Philosophy and Historical Thought (19 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Intellectual History Review are Peter R. Anstey, Ann Blair, Douglas Jesseph, Ian Hunter, Peter Harrison, Marie‐Noëlle Bourguet, Richard R. Yeo, John G. A. Pocock, Jacob Soll and Conal Condren.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact