Countries where authors publish in Intellectual History Review
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Intellectual History Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Intellectual History Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Intellectual History Review more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Intellectual History Review
This network shows the impact of papers published in Intellectual History Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Intellectual History Review.
About Intellectual History Review
The 540 papers published in Intellectual History Review in the last decades have received a total of 1.7k indexed citations . Papers published in Intellectual History Review usually cover History and Philosophy of Science (156 papers), History (151 papers), Philosophy (155 papers), Anthropology (70 papers) and Religious studies (37 papers) specifically the topics of Historical Philosophy and Science (86 papers), Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (74 papers), Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought (70 papers), American Constitutional Law and Politics (68 papers), Historical and Literary Studies (51 papers), History of Science and Medicine (41 papers), Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis (33 papers) and Religion, Gender, and Enlightenment (29 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Intellectual History Review are Peter R. Anstey, H. T. Dickinson, Andrew Wells, Ann Blair, Douglas Jesseph, Jonathan Sheehan, Mark A. Noll, Ian Hunter, Peter Harrison and Richard Yeo.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.