Countries where authors publish in History of Political Thought
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in History of Political Thought. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in History of Political Thought with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites History of Political Thought more than expected).
Fields of papers published in History of Political Thought
This network shows the impact of papers published in History of Political Thought. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in History of Political Thought.
About History of Political Thought
The 681 papers published in History of Political Thought in the last decades have received a total of 5.1k indexed citations . Papers published in History of Political Thought usually cover Philosophy (250 papers), History (149 papers), Political Science and International Relations (300 papers), History and Philosophy of Science (27 papers) and Religious studies (26 papers) specifically the topics of American Constitutional Law and Politics (143 papers), Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought (133 papers), Political Theory and Influence (112 papers), European Political History Analysis (56 papers), Classical Philosophy and Thought (51 papers), Political Philosophy and Ethics (47 papers), Political Economy and Marxism (45 papers) and Political Theology and Sovereignty (37 papers). The most active scholars publishing in History of Political Thought are Brian Tierney, Lisa Hill, Jeffrey C. Isaac, W.R.E. Velema, Richard Whatmore, Mark Bevir, J. G. A. Pocock, Alan Patten, Mark Neocleous and Arash Abizadeh.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.