History of Political Thought

643 papers and 2.0k indexed citations i.

About

The 643 papers published in History of Political Thought in the last decades have received a total of 2.0k indexed citations. Papers published in History of Political Thought usually cover Political Science and International Relations (290 papers), Philosophy (240 papers) and Sociology and Political Science (162 papers) specifically the topics of American Constitutional Law and Politics (138 papers), Development of Political Thought in Early Modern Era (126 papers) and Political Theory and Influence (109 papers). The most active scholars publishing in History of Political Thought are Margaret Canovan, Mark Neocleous, Barbara Arneil, Lisa Hill, Paul A. Rahe, John Salter, Mark Bevir, Alan Patten, Jeffrey C. Isaac and Cary J. Nederman.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in History of Political Thought

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in History of Political Thought. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in History of Political Thought.

Countries where authors publish in History of Political Thought

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in History of Political Thought. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in History of Political Thought with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites History of Political Thought more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025