Learning Media and Technology

715 papers and 17.3k indexed citations i.

About

The 715 papers published in Learning Media and Technology in the last decades have received a total of 17.3k indexed citations. Papers published in Learning Media and Technology usually cover Education (351 papers), Sociology and Political Science (265 papers) and Information Systems (149 papers) specifically the topics of Literacy, Media, and Education (126 papers), Impact of Technology on Adolescents (126 papers) and Child Development and Digital Technology (119 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Learning Media and Technology are Neil Selwyn, Ben Williamson, Rebecca Eynon, Martin Oliver, Christine Greenhow, Adrian Kirkwood, John Potter, Siân Bayne, Jeroen Jansz and Peter Nikken.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Learning Media and Technology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Learning Media and Technology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Learning Media and Technology.

Countries where authors publish in Learning Media and Technology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Learning Media and Technology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Learning Media and Technology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Learning Media and Technology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025