Countries where authors publish in The Career Development Quarterly
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in The Career Development Quarterly. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in The Career Development Quarterly with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Career Development Quarterly more than expected).
Fields of papers published in The Career Development Quarterly
This network shows the impact of papers published in The Career Development Quarterly. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in The Career Development Quarterly.
About The Career Development Quarterly
The 1.1k papers published in The Career Development Quarterly in the last decades have received a total of 30.3k indexed citations . Papers published in The Career Development Quarterly usually cover Safety Research (782 papers), General Psychology (29 papers), Social Psychology (472 papers), Education (507 papers) and Gender Studies (94 papers) specifically the topics of Career Development and Diversity (759 papers), Higher Education and Employability (249 papers), Mentoring and Academic Development (227 papers), Higher Education Research Studies (202 papers), Counseling Practices and Supervision (98 papers), Grit, Self-Efficacy, and Motivation (91 papers), Education, Achievement, and Giftedness (84 papers) and Diverse Educational Innovations Studies (78 papers). The most active scholars publishing in The Career Development Quarterly are Mark L. Savickas, Robert W. Lent, Nancy E. Betz, David L. Blustein, Andreas Hirschi, Ryan D. Duffy, Steven D. Brown, Wei‐Cheng Mau, Nadya A. Fouad and Y. Barry Chung.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.