Journal of Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology · 1×
×0.85k/6kPS
×0.65k/8kMB
×1.0933/971ND
×1.6957/597CB
×0.61k/2kFS
Citations per year
'16
'17
'18
'19
'20
'21
'22
'23
'24
'25
'26
Countries where authors publish in Scientifica
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Scientifica. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Scientifica with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Scientifica more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Scientifica. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Scientifica.
About Scientifica
The 963 papers published in Scientifica in the last decades have received a total of 22.9k indexed citations . Papers published in Scientifica usually cover Forestry (22 papers), Biochemistry (29 papers), Plant Science (176 papers), Complementary and alternative medicine (34 papers) and Food Science (69 papers) specifically the topics of Essential Oils and Antimicrobial Activity (34 papers), Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities (25 papers), Natural Antidiabetic Agents Studies (23 papers), Ethnobotanical and Medicinal Plants Studies (23 papers), African Botany and Ecology Studies (21 papers), Plant tissue culture and regeneration (14 papers), Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (13 papers) and Child Nutrition and Water Access (12 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Scientifica are Bernard R. Glick, Aaron Watkins James, Leiyu Shi, James B. Konopka, Axel H. Schönthal, Georges Feller, Daniel Gallie, Massimo Cogliati, Ahmad A. Tarhini and Mervyn Neale Weitzmann.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.