Countries where authors publish in Journal of Visual Art Practice
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Visual Art Practice. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Visual Art Practice with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Visual Art Practice more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Journal of Visual Art Practice
This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Visual Art Practice. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Visual Art Practice.
About Journal of Visual Art Practice
The 280 papers published in Journal of Visual Art Practice in the last decades have received a total of 755 indexed citations . Papers published in Journal of Visual Art Practice usually cover Visual Arts and Performing Arts (157 papers), Museology (33 papers), Urban Studies (45 papers), Geography, Planning and Development (23 papers) and Music (9 papers) specifically the topics of Artistic and Creative Research (57 papers), Visual Culture and Art Theory (49 papers), Art, Politics, and Modernism (41 papers), Cultural Industries and Urban Development (40 papers), Art Education and Development (38 papers), Museums and Cultural Heritage (24 papers), Geographies of human-animal interactions (22 papers) and Photography and Visual Culture (22 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Visual Art Practice are Ken Friedman, Howard Riley, Estelle Barrett, William P. Seeley, Graeme Harper, Sophia Krzys Acord, Ian Sutherland, Michael Jarvis, Alain Quemin and Anita Sinner.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.