Visual Communication Quarterly

348 papers and 2.0k indexed citations i.

About

The 348 papers published in Visual Communication Quarterly in the last decades have received a total of 2.0k indexed citations. Papers published in Visual Communication Quarterly usually cover Communication (84 papers), Sociology and Political Science (77 papers) and Literature and Literary Theory (62 papers) specifically the topics of Media Studies and Communication (70 papers), Visual Culture and Art Theory (48 papers) and Rhetoric and Communication Studies (46 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Visual Communication Quarterly are James Floyd Kelly, Shahira Fahmy, Hyunjin Seo, Sheree Josephson, Kimberly Bissell, Nicole Smith Dahmen, Ann Marie Barry, Mary Angela Bock, Wayne Wanta and Wilson Lowrey.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Visual Communication Quarterly

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Visual Communication Quarterly. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Visual Communication Quarterly.

Countries where authors publish in Visual Communication Quarterly

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Visual Communication Quarterly. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Visual Communication Quarterly with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Visual Communication Quarterly more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025