Visual Resources

413 papers and 946 indexed citations i.

About

The 413 papers published in Visual Resources in the last decades have received a total of 946 indexed citations. Papers published in Visual Resources usually cover Visual Arts and Performing Arts (141 papers), History (115 papers) and Museology (87 papers) specifically the topics of Photography and Visual Culture (70 papers), Visual Culture and Art Theory (68 papers) and Art History and Market Analysis (54 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Visual Resources are Anne Friedberg, Jonathan Smith, Johanna Drucker, Dagobert Soergel, Murtha Baca, Karen Markey, Amy Whitaker, Blake Stimson, James M. Turner and Chris E. Johanson.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Visual Resources

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Visual Resources. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Visual Resources.

Countries where authors publish in Visual Resources

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Visual Resources. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Visual Resources with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Visual Resources more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025