Current Clinical Pharmacology

478 papers and 9.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 478 papers published in Current Clinical Pharmacology in the last decades have received a total of 9.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Current Clinical Pharmacology usually cover Molecular Biology (87 papers), Oncology (64 papers) and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (59 papers) specifically the topics of Pharmacological Effects and Toxicity Studies (24 papers), Pharmaceutical studies and practices (22 papers) and Cancer Treatment and Pharmacology (21 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Current Clinical Pharmacology are Daniela Batovska, Ива Тодорова, Sorin E. Leucuţa, Surjit Singh, Philipp Y. Maximov, Theresa M. Lee, V. Craig Jordan, Ronald W. Pero, Jos H. Beijnen and Kristina Johnell.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Current Clinical Pharmacology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Current Clinical Pharmacology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Current Clinical Pharmacology.

Countries where authors publish in Current Clinical Pharmacology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Current Clinical Pharmacology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Current Clinical Pharmacology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Current Clinical Pharmacology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025