Project Management Journal

1.2k papers and 32.1k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.2k papers published in Project Management Journal in the last decades have received a total of 32.1k indexed citations. Papers published in Project Management Journal usually cover Management Science and Operations Research (741 papers), Strategy and Management (399 papers) and Management Information Systems (228 papers) specifically the topics of Construction Project Management and Performance (681 papers), Innovation and Knowledge Management (246 papers) and BIM and Construction Integration (137 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Project Management Journal are Bent Flyvbjerg, Ralf Müller, David Baccarini, Lavagnon A. Ika, J. Rodney Turner, Brian Hobbs, Kenneth Rose, Kam Jugdev, Terry Williams and Christophe Bredillet.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Project Management Journal

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Project Management Journal. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Project Management Journal.

Countries where authors publish in Project Management Journal

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Project Management Journal. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Project Management Journal with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Project Management Journal more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025