Journal of Evidence-Based Social Work

1.4k citations
285 papers · · active since 1952

Impact in

    • Social Work Education and Practice
    • Resilience and Mental Health
    • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
    • Child Abuse and Trauma
    • Migration, Health and Trauma
    • COVID-19 and Mental Health

Papers in

    • Social Work Education and Practice 54
    • Resilience and Mental Health 24
    • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development 20
    • Migration, Health and Trauma 20

Journal of Evidence-Based Social Work

221 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers

Journal of Evidence-Based Social Work
Comparison fields: 5 of 131
  • Public Administration 134
  • Clinical Psychology 659
  • Health 198
  • General Health Professions 453
  • Applied Psychology 61
Replace Kōtuitui New Zealand Journal of Social Sciences Online with:
Kōtuitui New Zealand Journal of Social Sciences Online New Zealand
Journal of Health and Human Services Administration United States
Methodological Innovations United Kingdom
Social Work and Social Sciences Review United Kingdom
Journal of Social Work in Disability & Rehabilitation United States
Asian Social Work and Policy Review South Korea
Global Social Welfare United States
Communication & Medicine United Kingdom
Studies in Social Justice Canada
International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics United States
Journal of Evidence-Based Social Work relative to Kōtuitui New Zealand Journal of Social Sciences Online New Zealand Kōtuitui New Zealand Journal of Social Sciences Online's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
Kōtuitui New Zealand Journal of Social Sciences Online · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Journal of Evidence-Based Social Work

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Evidence-Based Social Work. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Evidence-Based Social Work with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Evidence-Based Social Work more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Journal of Evidence-Based Social Work

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Evidence-Based Social Work. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Evidence-Based Social Work.

About Journal of Evidence-Based Social Work

The 285 papers published in Journal of Evidence-Based Social Work in the last decades have received a total of 1.4k indexed citations . Papers published in Journal of Evidence-Based Social Work usually cover Public Administration (54 papers), Clinical Psychology (113 papers), General Health Professions (130 papers), Health (34 papers) and Safety Research (24 papers) specifically the topics of Social Work Education and Practice (54 papers), Homelessness and Social Issues (30 papers), Resilience and Mental Health (24 papers), Community Health and Development (21 papers), Health Policy Implementation Science (21 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (20 papers), Migration, Health and Trauma (20 papers) and Mental Health and Patient Involvement (19 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Evidence-Based Social Work are Michael Ungar, Lisa McGarrigle, Philip Jefferies, Gerald J. Bean, Chitat Chan, Melissa Petrakis, Natasha K. Bowen, Hong Wang Fung, Colin A. Ross and Aaron Brown.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact