Asian Social Work and Policy Review

319 papers and 1.8k indexed citations i.

About

The 319 papers published in Asian Social Work and Policy Review in the last decades have received a total of 1.8k indexed citations. Papers published in Asian Social Work and Policy Review usually cover Sociology and Political Science (168 papers), General Health Professions (95 papers) and Clinical Psychology (56 papers) specifically the topics of Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving (66 papers), Social Policy and Reform Studies (45 papers) and Homelessness and Social Issues (34 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Asian Social Work and Policy Review are Zulkarnain A. Hatta, Isahaque Ali, Rituparna Bhattacharyya, M. Rezaul Islam, Jing Guo, Sang Kyoung Kahng, Ya Wen, Jill Hanley, Yuk King Lau and Azlinda Azman.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Asian Social Work and Policy Review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Asian Social Work and Policy Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Asian Social Work and Policy Review.

Countries where authors publish in Asian Social Work and Policy Review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Asian Social Work and Policy Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Asian Social Work and Policy Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Asian Social Work and Policy Review more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025