Social Work and Social Sciences Review

267 papers and 1.4k indexed citations i.

About

The 267 papers published in Social Work and Social Sciences Review in the last decades have received a total of 1.4k indexed citations. Papers published in Social Work and Social Sciences Review usually cover General Health Professions (131 papers), Public Administration (112 papers) and Education (86 papers) specifically the topics of Social Work Education and Practice (112 papers), Patient and Public Engagement in Healthcare Research (63 papers) and Personalisation of Social Care Services (54 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Social Work and Social Sciences Review are Rhidian Hughes, Meg Huby, Joseph Oliver, Jo Dixon, Lars Uggerhøj, Clive Sellick, Jerome Carson, Derek Kirton, Andy Bilson and Sarah Banks.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Social Work and Social Sciences Review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Social Work and Social Sciences Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Social Work and Social Sciences Review.

Countries where authors publish in Social Work and Social Sciences Review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Social Work and Social Sciences Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Social Work and Social Sciences Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Social Work and Social Sciences Review more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025