International Journal of Hindu Studies

288 papers and 650 indexed citations i.

About

The 288 papers published in International Journal of Hindu Studies in the last decades have received a total of 650 indexed citations. Papers published in International Journal of Hindu Studies usually cover Religious studies (135 papers), Philosophy (135 papers) and Sociology and Political Science (84 papers) specifically the topics of Indian and Buddhist Studies (129 papers), Indian History and Philosophy (85 papers) and Anthropological Studies and Insights (51 papers). The most active scholars publishing in International Journal of Hindu Studies are Philip Lutgendorf, Rita M. Gross, Dominik Wujastyk, Christian Lee Novetzke, John Zavos, Mark Bevir, William S. Sax, Nicholas Allen, Mark Singleton and Julius Lipner.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in International Journal of Hindu Studies

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in International Journal of Hindu Studies. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in International Journal of Hindu Studies.

Countries where authors publish in International Journal of Hindu Studies

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in International Journal of Hindu Studies. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in International Journal of Hindu Studies with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites International Journal of Hindu Studies more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025