Mark Singleton
Impact in
-
- Anesthesia and Sedative Agents
- Religious studies top 2%
- Indian and Buddhist Studies
Papers in
-
- Indian and Buddhist Studies 8
- Co-authors
- Judith Rosen (3 shared papers)Dennis M. Fisher (1 shared paper)Dennis M. Fisher (2 shared papers)Anita Honkanen (5 shared papers)Tyler M. Muffly (4 shared papers)Edwin Bakker (1 shared paper)Jean Byrne (1 shared paper)William Shapiro (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Anesthesia & Analgesia (4 papers)Histopathology (2 papers)Anesthesiology (2 papers)British Journal of Anaesthesia (1 paper)Journal of Pediatric Surgery (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomKenya
In The Last Decade
Mark Singleton
30 papers receiving 539 citations
Mark Singleton's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 95
- Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 114
- Religious studies 66
- Developmental Neuroscience 35
- Philosophy 67
- Clinical Psychology 92
Countries citing papers authored by Mark Singleton
This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Singleton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Singleton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Singleton more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Singleton
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Singleton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Singleton. The network helps show where Mark Singleton may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark Singleton, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 34 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Yoga Body Hit paper breakdown → | 2010 | 151 |
| 2 | 1987 | 87 | |
| 3 | 1988 | 74 | |
| 4 | 1985 | 36 | |
| 5 | 2005 | 26 | |
| 6 | 2017 | 24 | |
| 7 | Roots of Yoga | 2017 | 23 |
| 8 | 2016 | 21 | |
| 9 | 2007 | 20 | |
| 10 | 2018 | 19 | |
| 11 | 2017 | 19 | |
| 12 | 2016 | 18 | |
| 13 | 2007 | 14 | |
| 14 | 2016 | 14 | |
| 15 | 2008 | 14 | |
| 16 | 1984 | 13 | |
| 17 | 2013 | 10 | |
| 18 | 2007 | 8 | |
| 19 | 2019 | 7 | |
| 20 | 2019 | 7 |
About Mark Singleton
Mark Singleton is a scholar working on Religious studies, Philosophy, Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Clinical Psychology and Safety Research, having authored 34 papers that have together received 629 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Indian and Buddhist Studies (8 papers), Martial Arts: Techniques, Psychology, and Education (3 papers), Anesthesia and Sedative Agents (3 papers), Global Health and Surgery (2 papers), Weber, Simmel, Sociological Theory (2 papers), Pediatric Pain Management Techniques (2 papers), Abdominal Trauma and Injuries (2 papers) and Epilepsy research and treatment (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (114 citations), Religious studies (66 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (35 citations), Philosophy (67 citations) and Clinical Psychology (92 citations). Mark Singleton has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Kenya. Frequent co-authors include Judith Rosen, Dennis M. Fisher, Dennis M. Fisher, Anita Honkanen, Tyler M. Muffly, Edwin Bakker, Jean Byrne, William Shapiro, Cedric R. Bainton and Fred Morady. Their work appears in journals such as Anesthesia & Analgesia, Histopathology, Anesthesiology, British Journal of Anaesthesia and Journal of Pediatric Surgery.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.