Julius Lipner
Impact in
- Religious studies top 2%
- Indian and Buddhist Studies
- Philosophy top 2%
- Indian History and Philosophy
- Theology and Philosophy of Evil
- Karl Barth and Christian Theology
Papers in
-
- Indian and Buddhist Studies 11
- Biblical Studies and Interpretation 4
- Christian Theology and Mission 3
- Philosophy 15
- Indian History and Philosophy 11
- Theology and Philosophy of Evil 3
- Co-authors
- Harold Coward (2 shared papers)Rachel Fell McDermott (1 shared paper)Agehananda Bharati (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Religious Studies (4 papers)International Journal of Hindu Studies (3 papers)Philosophy East and West (3 papers)The Journal of Hindu Studies (1 paper)Sophia (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesAustralia
In The Last Decade
Julius Lipner
30 papers receiving 162 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 42
- Religious studies 75
- Philosophy 93
- Visual Arts and Performing Arts 14
- Health 21
- Anthropology 25
Countries citing papers authored by Julius Lipner
This map shows the geographic impact of Julius Lipner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Julius Lipner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Julius Lipner more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Julius Lipner
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Julius Lipner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Julius Lipner. The network helps show where Julius Lipner may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 3 scholars most cited alongside Julius Lipner, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 34 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hindus: Their Religious Beliefs and Practices | 1993 | 64 |
| 2 | 1986 | 12 | |
| 3 | 2005 | 11 | |
| 4 | 1996 | 10 | |
| 5 | 1988 | 10 | |
| 6 | 2006 | 10 | |
| 7 | 1984 | 8 | |
| 8 | 2012 | 8 | |
| 9 | Brahmabandhab Upadhyay: The Life and Thought of a Revolutionary | 1999 | 7 |
| 10 | 2019 | 6 | |
| 11 | The face of truth | 1985 | 6 |
| 12 | 1990 | 6 | |
| 13 | 1978 | 5 | |
| 14 | 1990 | 4 | |
| 15 | 1992 | 4 | |
| 16 | 2003 | 4 | |
| 17 | 1993 | 3 | |
| 18 | 1977 | 3 | |
| 19 | 2008 | 3 | |
| 20 | 1978 | 3 |
About Julius Lipner
Julius Lipner is a scholar working on Religious studies, Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations and Clinical Psychology, having authored 34 papers that have together received 204 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Indian and Buddhist Studies (11 papers), Indian History and Philosophy (11 papers), Biblical Studies and Interpretation (4 papers), Religion and Society Interactions (4 papers), Christian Theology and Mission (3 papers), Religion, Society, and Development (3 papers), Theology and Philosophy of Evil (3 papers) and Politics and Conflicts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Middle East (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Religious studies (75 citations), Philosophy (93 citations), Visual Arts and Performing Arts (14 citations), Health (21 citations) and Anthropology (25 citations). Julius Lipner has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Harold Coward, Rachel Fell McDermott and Agehananda Bharati. Their work appears in journals such as Religious Studies, International Journal of Hindu Studies, Philosophy East and West, The Journal of Hindu Studies and Sophia.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.