Music Reference Services Quarterly

240 papers and 526 indexed citations i.

About

The 240 papers published in Music Reference Services Quarterly in the last decades have received a total of 526 indexed citations. Papers published in Music Reference Services Quarterly usually cover Music (122 papers), Information Systems (55 papers) and Signal Processing (29 papers) specifically the topics of Diverse Musicological Studies (68 papers), Music History and Culture (49 papers) and Musicology and Musical Analysis (41 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Music Reference Services Quarterly are Rachel Scott, Cassidy R. Sugimoto, Patrick Lo, Jennifer Oates, Joseph R. Matson, Carlyle Crenshaw, Nicholas Temperley, Harry E. Pence, Richard Freedman and Karen Olson.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Music Reference Services Quarterly

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Music Reference Services Quarterly. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Music Reference Services Quarterly.

Countries where authors publish in Music Reference Services Quarterly

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Music Reference Services Quarterly. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Music Reference Services Quarterly with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Music Reference Services Quarterly more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025