Cambridge Opera Journal

369 papers and 752 indexed citations i.

About

The 369 papers published in Cambridge Opera Journal in the last decades have received a total of 752 indexed citations. Papers published in Cambridge Opera Journal usually cover Music (251 papers), Literature and Literary Theory (54 papers) and Sociology and Political Science (41 papers) specifically the topics of Musicology and Musical Analysis (223 papers), Theater, Performance, and Music History (117 papers) and Diverse Musicological Studies (67 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Cambridge Opera Journal are Ralph P. Locke, Philip Gossett, Mary Ann Smart, Lawrence Kramer, Paul Robinson, Barry Millington, Peter Kivy, Robert D. Hume, Richard Taruskin and Andreas Giger.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Cambridge Opera Journal

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Cambridge Opera Journal. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Cambridge Opera Journal.

Countries where authors publish in Cambridge Opera Journal

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Cambridge Opera Journal. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Cambridge Opera Journal with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cambridge Opera Journal more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025