Saudi Pharmaceutical Journal

2.0k papers and 41.5k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.0k papers published in Saudi Pharmaceutical Journal in the last decades have received a total of 41.5k indexed citations. Papers published in Saudi Pharmaceutical Journal usually cover Molecular Biology (406 papers), Pharmaceutical Science (254 papers) and Geriatrics and Gerontology (253 papers) specifically the topics of Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (250 papers), Advanced Drug Delivery Systems (158 papers) and Drug Solubulity and Delivery Systems (145 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Saudi Pharmaceutical Journal are A. K. Saluja, Aditya Ganeshpurkar, Syed A. A. Rizvi, Ayman Saleh, Md Rafiquzzaman, Md Nur Alam, Abad Khan, Asmat Ullah, Ali A. El‐Gamal and Muaed Jamal Alomar.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Saudi Pharmaceutical Journal

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Saudi Pharmaceutical Journal. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Saudi Pharmaceutical Journal.

Countries where authors publish in Saudi Pharmaceutical Journal

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Saudi Pharmaceutical Journal. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Saudi Pharmaceutical Journal with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Saudi Pharmaceutical Journal more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025