Clinical Neurophysiology

329.9k citations
9.1k papers · · active since 1950

Impact in

    • EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
    • Neural dynamics and brain function
    • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
    • Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
    • Neuroscience and Music Perception
  • Neurology top 0.5%
    • Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies

Papers in

    • Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies 1.2k
    • Neurological disorders and treatments 431
    • Vestibular and auditory disorders 267
    • EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces 754
    • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies 455

Clinical Neurophysiology

6.1k papers receiving 238.6k citations

Peers

Clinical Neurophysiology
Comparison fields: 5 of 236
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 171.5k
  • Neurology 58.1k
  • Neurology 36.4k
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 34.7k
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 41.4k
Replace Frontiers in Neuroscience with:
Frontiers in Neuroscience China
Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology United States
Human Brain Mapping United States
Journal of Neuroscience Methods United States
Neuroreport United States
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience United States
Cerebral Cortex United States
Nature reviews. Neuroscience United States
Neuropsychologia United States
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews United States
Clinical Neurophysiology relative to Frontiers in Neuroscience China Frontiers in Neuroscience's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Frontiers in Neuroscience · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Clinical Neurophysiology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Clinical Neurophysiology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Clinical Neurophysiology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Clinical Neurophysiology more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Clinical Neurophysiology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Clinical Neurophysiology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Clinical Neurophysiology.

About Clinical Neurophysiology

The 9.1k papers published in Clinical Neurophysiology in the last decades have received a total of 329.9k indexed citations . Papers published in Clinical Neurophysiology usually cover Neurology (1.5k papers), Cognitive Neuroscience (1.8k papers), Neurology (1.1k papers), Psychiatry and Mental health (817 papers) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (462 papers) specifically the topics of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies (1.2k papers), EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (754 papers), Epilepsy research and treatment (479 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (455 papers), Neurological disorders and treatments (431 papers), Vestibular and auditory disorders (267 papers), Muscle activation and electromyography studies (256 papers) and Peripheral Nerve Disorders (225 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Clinical Neurophysiology are John Polich, G. Pfurtscheller, Cornelis J. Stam, Robert J. Barry, Paolo Maria Rossini, Mark Hallett, Niels Birbaumer, Gert Pfurtscheller, Jonathan R. Wolpaw and Álvaro Pascual‐Leone.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact