Holocaust Studies
242 papers receiving 752 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
- Social Psychology 489
- Museology 86
- History 181
- Space and Planetary Science 21
- Philosophy 133
Countries where authors publish in Holocaust Studies
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Holocaust Studies. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Holocaust Studies with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Holocaust Studies more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Holocaust Studies
This network shows the impact of papers published in Holocaust Studies. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Holocaust Studies.
About Holocaust Studies
The 374 papers published in Holocaust Studies in the last decades have received a total of 949 indexed citations . Papers published in Holocaust Studies usually cover Social Psychology (194 papers), History (99 papers), Philosophy (76 papers), Space and Planetary Science (8 papers) and Museology (17 papers) specifically the topics of Memory, Trauma, and Commemoration (191 papers), Italian Fascism and Post-war Society (58 papers), European history and politics (57 papers), Polish-Jewish Holocaust Memory Studies (50 papers), German History and Society (47 papers), Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies (41 papers), Educator Training and Historical Pedagogy (35 papers) and Eastern European Communism and Reforms (28 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Holocaust Studies are Sue Vice, Adam Brown, Claire Griffiths, Robert Eaglestone, Peter Davies, Tom Lawson, Mykola Makhortykh, Arthur Chapman, Claudio Minca and Bodo von Borries.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.