New Review of Film and Television Studies

466 papers and 1.0k indexed citations i.

About

The 466 papers published in New Review of Film and Television Studies in the last decades have received a total of 1.0k indexed citations. Papers published in New Review of Film and Television Studies usually cover Economics and Econometrics (267 papers), Literature and Literary Theory (127 papers) and Sociology and Political Science (124 papers) specifically the topics of Cinema and Media Studies (266 papers), Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism (72 papers) and Digital Games and Media (35 papers). The most active scholars publishing in New Review of Film and Television Studies are David Sterritt, Thomas Elsaesser, Matt Hills, Barry Salt, Catherine Johnson, Derek Johnson, David Martin‐Jones, Charles Forceville, Les Roberts and Julian Hanich.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in New Review of Film and Television Studies

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in New Review of Film and Television Studies. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in New Review of Film and Television Studies.

Countries where authors publish in New Review of Film and Television Studies

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in New Review of Film and Television Studies. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in New Review of Film and Television Studies with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites New Review of Film and Television Studies more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025